Multiversal Gravitration emitted and absorbed by all matter will interact at points which I refer to as 'gravitrational nodes'. These points will have the ability to either absorb more gravitration than they emit and thereby increase in mass, emit and absorb in equilibrium, thereby maintaining a constant mass, or eventually emit more than they absorb, thereby decreasing in mass in a controlled or explosive manner.

These 'states' of mass will be applicable to all accumulated matter in the multiverse, thereby creating a constantly changing or 'living' environment, which fluctuates back and forth from the gravitrational state of space, to its denser forms of material mass.

Gravitrational nodes could exist as low mass but highly interactive entities whereby they are the focus of much and/or intense gravitration, and are able to emit and absorb at a similar rate. This would give them the gravitational signature of 'black holes' without the mass, much as a small reflective sphere will reflect more light and appear more visible than a large dark sphere.

In contemplating the range of material states, it should also be acknowledged that hot bodies such as stars could still be net absorbers of gravitration, as it can be appreciated that an internal change of state allowing the emission of light would not automatically signify a net energy/mass reduction, although there would obviously be an increased probability of this occurring in these circumstances.

CENTRES OF GRAVITY

It is not by accident that the basic elements of structure in the macroscopic and microscopic multiverse that we are aware of, such as stars, planets, atoms, electrons etc are of a near spherical shape. This I believe is because the forces of gravitration act and interact in an overall uniform-like way to form such masses by the combined processes of impact and reaction of the gravitrons and other combined masses. The uniform sphere therefore represents the most gravitationally efficient form as it has a centre of gravity the same distance from any point on its surface and therefore is well-balanced in all three dimensions and able to rotate and move with minimum eccentricity and wobble in relation to other matter.

I believe that the gravitational attraction between spheres is less than that between flat surfaces from bodies of the same masses and separations from their centres of gravity. I am not sure as to what experimental evidence exists to justify this, and would suggest that the differences would be difficult to detect, although I would propose that they would exist because of the slight difference in the intensity of emitted gravitration relative to the differing surface angles.

An analogy of this is to compare the intensity of infra red radiation emitted from the surface of a 'blackbody' as described in Lamberts Cosine Law in which he discovered that the intensity was greatest in a direction 'normal' to the surface and decreased progressively with increasing angles to the tangent such that 'angular intensity=intensity at a direction normal to the surface x cosine of angle'