To illustrate this idea, it is worth considering Gravitration with respect to ourselves. We know for instance, that when we walk, we apply a force to enable our legs to be lifted against gravity, which subsequently draws them down again. Both the up and down movement of the legs would appear to an alien onlooker to be subject to the same forces, and so it would not be obvious to him (without knowing) that differing forces were present. The alien would assume that the up and down motions were opposite forces of the same mechanisms. Well, what if the alien was correct in his interpretation, and the lifting of the legs, were in fact due to an applied counter gravitational force, albeit a primitive form. Would it in fact not be more logical to assume that by moving, we are in effect generating our own interactive gravitational force, such that momentum and inertia are a result of the interaction with the universal ‘gravitational atmosphere’ (gravisphere).
We are naturally conditioned to the idea that to ‘propel’ ourselves or another object, we have to apply a certain force to overcome a resistance, and likewise, to stop moving we have to apply an opposite force. We also know that the more massive the object, the greater the force required to both accelerate and decelerate it, due to these ‘properties’ of inertia and momentum, neither of which I believe have been subject of a proper scientific explanation. I believe that my hypothesis of multiversal gravitration allows such explanations, by comparing these effects to movement within a viscous fluid, which represents the gravisphere, such that ‘drag’ is induced upon a motive mass, which both inhibits initial motion and further sustains it. This, I believe is the phenomena which governs the acceleration of differing masses subject to a similar gravitrational force to be the same, and I have termed the effect ‘gravitrational viscosity’. Such comparisons between gravity and motion have led me to consider that these forces could be of the same origin, but applied in different directions.

A pendulum is considered to operate by converting the momentum of its mass to store and release gravitational potential energy in a cyclic manner by gravitational attraction of its mass to Earth. In comparison, a revolving flywheel spins with gravitational equilibrium and it is assumed to store its energy through a concept called, the ‘conservation of momentum’ i.e, the constituent mass particles of the flywheel want to remain travelling at a constant velocity and in a constant direction. So, of the two forms of kinetic energy storage systems, the pendulum is considered to be a gravity device and the flywheel is not, however, a common factor remains, which is that in both examples the energy release is proportional to their masses and velocities.