I therefore propose that a more accurate ‘Gravitational’ assessment of the flywheel mechanics might be in considering the force applied in spinning it is ‘transferred’ within the atomic structure of the material, such that a net increase in gravitration occurs in a direction opposite to this applied ‘internally compressive’ force, and is emitted predominantly tangentially relative to its spinning axis over the peripheral surface of the flywheel, thereby providing ‘thrust’, in a similar effect to that of a spinning firework (Catherine wheel). Consequently, an equal and opposite force will be generated about the system associated with this applied force in the same way.  Therefore, when a force is applied to the spinning flywheel in an opposite direction, such as a brake or application of mechanical machinery, there is likewise a proportional equal and opposite effect reducing the tangential gravitration on the flywheel ‘system’ and distributing it to the brake ‘system’. (‘system’, predominantly being all physically attached mass).

It is important at this stage to examine the relationship between gravitration and energy, as I have previously theorised that mass and surface area are the primary contributors of gravitation, it follows that energy should also have an association as it has been widely accepted to form a relationship to mass as described by the tremendous accomplishments of Albert Einstein and his famous equation E=mc². Einstein realised that energy was released in accordance with a reduction in mass and therefore were essentially inversely proportional to each other by some factor. He was also aware that processes involving high levels of energy release were generally accompanied by an intense release of light or radiation as we observe with the Sun, stars, electrical and chemical ‘explosions’. It was a matter of some logical application of thought to ascertain that the relationship between mass and energy was to a factor of the velocity of light (electromagnetic radiation). This factor he discovered to be c² (speed of light x speed of light), which again, I believe, is synonymous to a degree with the gravitrational effect. Now, if we conceptualise the reduction in the mass of the Sun and other stars as they produce and radiate energy (ignoring localised changes in mass densities), it can be appreciated that such a reduction of mass must also be accompanied by a reduction in their gravitational influence, which would indicate that energy and gravity are also directly related. As I propose all matter constantly emits and absorbs gravitration on a multiversal basis, the gain or loss of mass will vary depending on its position relative to all other matter, and this process could be considered relatively innocuous up to a point of critical mass, where either the absorption rate becomes greater than the emission rate and storage capacity, or the emission rate becomes greater than the absorption rate and storage capacity, (storage capacity being used to term the ability of the mass to store or release gravitration in a controlled manner). Such uncontrolled scenarios, could be considered to be represented by high rate energy releases such as stars, supernovas and big bang events.